There is, also in
addition….a positive feeling caused by an awakened national
self-consciousness that Indians should have more control in the management
of the railways in their own country….We therefore do not hesitate, though
most of us have approached the question with a strong pre-possession in
favour of private enterprise as a general proposition, to recommend that
in India the state should manage directly the railways which it already
owns...... Excerpts
from the Acworth committee recommendations On the 30th June, 1925 the Great
Indian Peninsula Railway was also brought under State control. The separation of
Railway Finances from General Budget in 1924 and the acceptance by the State in
1925 in principle marked a revolutionary change in policy for the responsibility
of direct operation of its own railways.
The legislative assembly in February 1923 recommended that the State shall take
over the management of the East Indian and the Great Indian Peninsula Railways
on expiry of their contracts. On the 1st January, 1925 the State took over the
reins of the East Indian Railway.
The
Acworth committee recommendations of 1924 laid the foundations of State
management and State control of Indian Railways.
This afforded Railways considerable financial and administrative autonomy to
conduct their own affairs and to initiate and carry out future policies on
“sound business principles”